Supply Chain Lab Aggregate Planning Lab Home
Planning & Forecasting

Aggregate Planning: Chase vs Level

Twelve months of demand, one workforce decision per month. The Level plan holds workers constant and lets inventory swing; the Chase plan tracks demand and pays hiring & firing. Set your own workforce month by month and compare all three total costs side by side.

How to use it

Demand & costs

Monthly demand (units)

Costs

Each worker makes 100 units/month; overtime can add up to 15% of regular capacity when the plan is short.

Demand (navy bars) vs each strategy's monthly production capacity: Level (teal), Chase (red), Your plan (purple).

Try these experiments

  1. On seasonal demand make Level beat Chase, then invert the result by raising just the holding cost.
  2. Build a hybrid plan (small workforce steps, overtime absorbing peaks) that beats both benchmarks by >10% on the spiky pattern.
  3. Drop the backlog cost until deliberately running stockouts becomes the rational plan - then ask what that assumption means for customer service.

About this tool

The concept

Aggregate planning sets workforce and production at the family level, months ahead - trading inventory, hiring and service against each other.

How it works

Level keeps a constant workforce (inventory swings); Chase resizes the workforce every month (hire/fire costs). Both are simulated with identical cost inputs.

Winning strategy

Neither pure strategy is best in general - the cost structure decides, and a hybrid with modest workforce steps plus overtime usually wins on spiky demand.

Background: Aggregate planning · S&OP