How to use it
- Choose the category. Each market has different cost, capacity and risk economics.
- Set decision priorities. Move the four weights or use a board-level policy preset.
- Run the analysis. The engine allocates demand subject to capacity and ESG constraints.
- Defend the award. Read the frontier, matrix and stress loss, then submit the recommendation.
Annual TCO
$0.0M
Expected loss
$0k
Weighted OTD
0%
Scope 3
0t
Decision score
0
Recommended sourcing networkBalanced value · ready
MODEL READY
The award is capacity-feasible. Run the stress test to expose concentration risk.
Suppliers awarded0
Continuity0%
Concentration HHI0
Supply risk × award impact
Award share raises profit impact; risk remains a supplier and lane property.
Efficient sourcing frontier
The best policy is not simply the left-most point: continuity has economic value.
Supplier evidence pack
Swipe the table sideways to see every column.
| Supplier | Region | Unit cost | Lead | OTD | Defects | CO₂ / unit | Risk | Award |
|---|
Run the model to generate an executive recommendation.
The procurement question
A bid price is not a sourcing decision. The economic choice includes quality failure, working capital, disruption exposure, capacity and carbon.
The model logic
Each supplier receives a normalised multi-criteria score. Demand is awarded in rank order subject to capacity, ESG eligibility and the optional 65% concentration cap.
Class challenge
- Keep OTD above 95%.
- Keep continuity above 85%.
- Explain why the cheapest bid may raise TCO.
Educational decision model for procurement analytics. Measures are synthetic and designed for classroom experimentation.